Re Armstrong. ex parte Gilchrist
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1886 |
| Year | 1886 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
35 cases
- Nahar Singh; Pang Hon Chin
- Re Mathieson
-
Re Universal & Surety Company Ltd
...LIMITED P. Lamontagne, Q.C. for the applicant; A. Jones for the respondent. Cases cited: (1) Gilchrist, Ex p., In re ArmstrongELR(1886), 17 Q.B.D. 521, dicta of Lord Esher, M.R. applied. (2) Iran Nabuvat, The, [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1115; [1990] 3 All E.R. 9, dicta of Lord Donaldson of Lymington, ......
-
The Canada Trust Company (Acting in its capacity as Trustee of the Chrysler Canada Ltd's Benefits Plan, the Chrysler Canada Ld. Master Trust Fund, the Chrysler Canada Ltd Non-Canadian Master Trust Fund and The Holmes Foundry Division Master Trust Fund) and Others v Century Holdings Ltd and Others
...therein: ‘ Smith v. Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd. (Practice Note) [1997] 4 All E.R. 840 , CA Ex p. Gilchirist , Re Armstrong (1886) 17 Q.BD. 521at 528 Buckle v. Holmes [1926] 2. K.B. 125 at 127.’ 13 Mr. Dennis further urged that it is settled law a discovery defendant who is in doubt ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Confirming Established Principles
...what trustees and practitioners had long considered to be established principles of law. Re Al-Sabah [2004-05] CILR 373 Re Armstrong (1886) 17 QBD 521 (CA) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International SAL [2009] 2 WLR 621 Smith Barney Private Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd v Cebreros & or......
2 books & journal articles
-
Reforming Family Law Without Compromising The Integrity of Trust Law : Recognising Wealth Held In Trust When Reallocating Family Property On Separation
...4; and Hudson, above n 2, at 190. 11 Z v Z (No 2) [1997] 2 NZLR 258, [1997] NZFLR 241 (CA) at 278, citing Re Armstrong, Ex p Gilchrist (1886) 17 QBD 521 at 579. 12 John Priestley “Whence and Whither: Reflections on the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 by a Retired Judge” (2017) 15 Otago LR......
-
Preliminary Sections
...v. England (1961) 1 W.L.R. 608; (1961) 2 All E.R. 4. 73 England v. Palmer 14 W.A.C.A. 659, 660. 261 Ex parte Gilchrist in re Armstrong(1886) 17 Q.B.D. 521, 528. 35 Ex parte Woodhall (1888) 20 Q.B.D. 835. 250 Gatti v. Shoosmith (1939) 3 All E.R. 916, 919. 35 Gbadesere v. Edu W.A.C.A. 32/1955......