Re Arton (No. 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1896
Date1896

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
48 cases
  • Re Nielsen
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 April 1984
    ...a practice which has apparently been followed at Bow Street in extradition cases since the judgment of a Divisional Court in In re Arton (No. 2) [1896] 1 Q.B. 509, evidence of Danish criminal law was called on behalf of the Danish government and, in particular, expert evidence as to the wor......
  • R v Governor of Ashford Remand Centre, ex parte Postlethwaite
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 13 July 1987
    ...two important principles are to be borne in mind. The first is expressed in the well known dictum of Lord Russell of Killowen C.J. in In re Arton (No. 2) [1896] 1 Q.B. 509, 517 where he said: "In my judgment these treaties ought to receive a liberal interpretation, which means no more than......
  • R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Budlong; R v Governor of Holloway Prison, ex parte Kember
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 November 1979
    ...it is the actual facts of the offence which are all important rather than the definition of the crime in the foreign law. In In re Arton (No. 2)ELR [1896] 1 Q.B. 509 extradition was demanded for ‘faux,’ which is the French equivalent of forgery. The facts did not disclose the offence of for......
  • R v Pentonville Prison (Governor)ex parte Ecke
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free