Re Aschrott. Clifton v Strauss

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1927
Date1927
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Re Ferguson
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 8 Diciembre 1935
    ...2 H. & N. 339; Erie Beach Co., Ltd. v. Attorney-General for OntarioELR, [1930] A. C. 161: and In re Ashcrott: Clifton v. StraussELR [1927] 1 Ch. 313, applied. Position of the Accountant of the Courts of Justice into whose name securities of a person of unsound mind have been transferred, co......
  • Duke of Buccleuch v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 Diciembre 1966
  • Duke of Buccleuch v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 23 Julio 1965
    ...be subject to restrictions if he wished to dispose of it. That is shown by Re Cassel, 1927, 2 Chancery, p. 275, by He Aschrott in 1927, 1 Chancery, p. 313, and by the Crossman case in 1937 Appeal Cases, p. 26. 9 (4) Here we come to the real point in this case — You are to envisage a hypot......
  • Lamb v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...A - G v Higgins, 2 H. & N. 339; Stern v Reg. 1896 (1) Q.B. 211; Baelz v Public Trustee, 1926 Ch. 863; Re Aschrott, Clifton v Strauss, 1927 (1) Ch. 313. This rule has likewise been applied in the Union for similar purposes; see The Treasury v Consolidated Mines Selection Co. Ltd., 1918 T.P.D......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT