Re Aschrott. Clifton v Strauss
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1927 |
Date | 1927 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Re Ferguson
...2 H. & N. 339; Erie Beach Co., Ltd. v. Attorney-General for OntarioELR, [1930] A. C. 161: and In re Ashcrott: Clifton v. StraussELR [1927] 1 Ch. 313, applied. Position of the Accountant of the Courts of Justice into whose name securities of a person of unsound mind have been transferred, co......
- Duke of Buccleuch v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
-
Duke of Buccleuch v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...be subject to restrictions if he wished to dispose of it. That is shown by Re Cassel, 1927, 2 Chancery, p. 275, by He Aschrott in 1927, 1 Chancery, p. 313, and by the Crossman case in 1937 Appeal Cases, p. 26. 9 (4) Here we come to the real point in this case — You are to envisage a hypot......
-
Lamb v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
...A - G v Higgins, 2 H. & N. 339; Stern v Reg. 1896 (1) Q.B. 211; Baelz v Public Trustee, 1926 Ch. 863; Re Aschrott, Clifton v Strauss, 1927 (1) Ch. 313. This rule has likewise been applied in the Union for similar purposes; see The Treasury v Consolidated Mines Selection Co. Ltd., 1918 T.P.D......
Request a trial to view additional results