Re Ashton; R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1992 |
Year | 1992 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Ex parte Guardian Newspapers Ltd
...relating to trial on indictment within Section 29(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and is not therefore amenable to judicial review. See In re Ashton [1994] 1 AC 9 where Lord Slynn of Hadley said at p 20D: "In the present case where the order was made at the very beginning of the trial, or ......
-
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte H. (A Minor)
...on the use of that word 'proceedings' in that context rather than 'trial']… see the guidance in Smalley and Sampson which was endorsed In re Ashton. Moving on to the 'further pointer' suggested by Lord Browne-Wilkinson at page 1530 in R -v- Manchester Crown Court ex parte DPP, 'Is the decis......
-
R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
... ... And Other (Respondents) (On Appeal From a Divisional Court of the Queens Bench Division) [1999] UKHL J1028-2 ... but was adjourned on the grounds of late service of evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service. The new trial started on 12 October 1998. Counsel for ... by Lord Slynn of Hadley (speaking for a unanimous House) in In re Ashton [1994] 1 A.C. 9 , 17. Mr Pannick argues that judicial review of a ... v. Manchester Crown Court, Ex parte Director of Public Prosecution [1993] 1 W.L.R ... ...
-
R v Maidstone Crown Court, ex parte Clark (Paul)
...past decade, been four decisions of the House of Lords on the subject. In Re Smalley 1985 1 A.C. 622, in Re Samson 1987 1 W.L.R. 194, in Re Ashton 1994 1 A.C. 9 and R.v. Manchester Crown Court and Others ex parte the DPP reported at 1993 1 W.L.R 1524, and 98 C.A.R. 461, which is the latest......
Request a trial to view additional results