Re Astor's Settlement Trusts. Astor v Scholfield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1952
Date1952
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Re Chionh Ke Hu, deceased
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1964
  • Whishaw and Another v Stephens and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 31 October 1968
    ...[1958] 1 All E.R. 401. Allen, decd., In re [1953] Ch. 810; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 637; [1953] 2 All E.R. 898, C.A. Astor's Settlement Trusts [1952] Ch. 534; [1952] 1 All E.R. 1067. Fawcett Properties Ltd. v. Buckingham County Council [1961] A.C. 636; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 831; [1960] 3 All E.R. 503, H.L......
  • Re Endacott, decd.; Corpe v Endacott
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 12 October 1959
    ... ... conveniently in his recent decision in the case of Astor's Settlement Trusts , reported in 1952 1 Chancery at page ... ...
  • Muir v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 May 1966
    ... ... inclusive in respect of income arising under a settlement which he had made in May, 1947. The assessments were made ... and issue of such person with such discretionary trusts or powers and such powers of appointment exercisable by ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...54–55 Re Amland Estate (1975), 10 NBR (2d) 285 (QB) ...............................................191 Re Astor’s Settlement Trusts, [1952] Ch 534........................................................ 72 Re Babour, [1967] Qd R 10 .................................................................
  • Equity and Trusts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...are hired). A potential future beneiciary is not a beneiciary and can have no rights under the trust, but the trustees are required 15 [1952] Ch 534 at 541. 16 See, for example, Trust (Jersey) Law 1984 , art 12. 17 See, for example, SA v Metro Vancouver Housing Corp , 2019 SCC 4. 18 See, fo......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...Bullion DMCC v Chay Fook Yuen [2016] 4 SLR 1248 at [55]. 79 See Morice v Bishop of Durham(1804) 9 Ves Jr 399; Re Astor's Settlement Trusts[1952] Ch 534; Koh Lau Keow v Attorney-General[2013] 4 SLR 491 at [18]. 80 See Petingall v Petingall(1842) 11 LJ Ch 176; Re Hooper[1932] 1 Ch 38; Mussett......
  • RESERVATION OF SETTLOR’S POWERS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2009, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...of Wall v Commissioner: An Answer to the Problem of Settlor Standing in Trust Law” (2004—2005) NW U L Rev 1723 at 1767. 40 Re Astor’s ST [1952] Ch 534 at 542, per Roxburgh J; Bradshaw v University College of Wales[1988] 1 WLR 190 at 194, per Hoffman J. 41 Re Astor’s ST [1952] Ch 534 at 542.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT