Re B (A Minor) (Habitual Residence)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] EWHC 2174 (Fam) |
| Date | 2016 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Re C (Children)
...of habitual residence, at §67, by referring to, and citing extensively from, another Re B case, Re B (A Minor) (Habitual Residence) [2016] EWHC 2174 (Fam), in which Hayden J set out a number of propositions of law drawn from the recent Supreme Court judgments on habitual residence, includin......
-
Surrey County Council v NR
...(a child) (habitual residence) (inherent jurisdiction), Re[2015] EWCA Civ 886, [2016] 2 WLR 487. B (a minor) (habitual residence), Re[2016] EWHC 2174 (Fam), [2016] 4 WLR B (minors) (abduction) (no 1),Re[1994] 1 FCR 389, [1993] 1 FLR 988, FD. F (a child) (care proceedings: habitual residence......
-
C (Children)
...of the younger child, for somewhat longer than he had lived in Australia. By reference to the decision of Hayden J in In re B (A Child) (Custody Rights: Habitual Residence) [2016] EWHC 2174 (Fam); [2016] 4 WLR 156, he directed himself correctly as to the test of habitual residence and the......
-
L v M
...[56]–[61], below). (4) Using the check list of factors helpfully summarised in Re B (a child) (custody rights: habitual residence)[2016] EWHC 2174 (Fam), the court concluded that in March 2019 the twins were habitually resident in China. At that time they were living in China with the mothe......
Request a trial to view additional results