Re Bailey, Hay & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1971
Date1971

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Re BW Estates Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • July 22, 2016
    ...into administration. Either way is sufficient to defeat the claim in this case. 45 I was also referred to the decision in Re Bailey, Hay & Co Limited [1971] 1 WLR 1357, a decision of Brightman J. That case is particularly pertinent because it touched upon the validity of a winding up. What ......
  • Prospect Properties Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v McNeill
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • December 3, 1990
    ...(No. 2 of 1982), [1984] Q.B. 624; [1984] 2 All E.R. 216; (1982), 78 Cr. App. R. 131, considered. (5) Bailey, Hay & Co. Ltd., In re, [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1357; [1971] 3 All E.R. 693. (6) Belmont Fin. Corp. Ltd. v. Williams Furniture Ltd., [1979] Ch. 250; [1979] 1 All E.R. 118, dicta of Buckley, L......
  • South Bank Hotel Management Company Ltd v Galliard Hotels Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • February 6, 2026
    ...agreement, objectively established, will suffice”. 78 Amongst the cases to which Etherton LJ referred in Schofield was Re Bailey, Hay & Co Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1357, on which Mr Trompeter relied. In that case, Brightman J held that a resolution to wind up a company was effective even though due......
  • South Bank Hotel Management Company Ltd v Galliard Hotels Ltd and Otherslodgeshine Ltd v South Bank Hotel Management Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • January 1, 2026
    ...of Newey LJ: BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25; [2024] AC 211; [2022] 3 WLR 709; [2022] Bus LR 920; [2023] 2 All ER 303, SC(E) Bailey, Hay & Co Ltd, In re [1971] 1 WLR 1357; [1971] 3 All ER 693 Bell v Peter Browne & Co [1990] 2 QB 495; [1990] 3 WLR 510; [1990] 3 All ER 124, CA Br......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Q&A Company Law
    • Invalid date
    ...3 All ER 1019 160, 176, 178 Bahia and San Francisco Rly Co Ltd, Re (1868) LR 3 QB 584 150 Bailey Hay and Co Ltd, Re [1971] 1 WLR 1357; [1971] 3 All ER 693 197 Bairstow v Queens’ Moat Houses plc [2001] EWCA Civ 712; [2001] All ER (D) 211 (May) 155 Ballast plc (in admin), Re [2004] EWHC 2356 ......
  • Company Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2011, December 2011
    • December 1, 2011
    ...as it may signal a difference from that adopted in the UK. In Cane v JonesWLR[1980] 1 WLR 1451(and see also Re Bailey Hay & Co LtdWLR[1971] 1 WLR 1357), it was held that the Duomatic principle could be applied to effect an amendment to the company's articles of association so as to deprive ......