Re Baker. Nichols v Baker

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1889
Year1889
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • HP Bulmer Ltd v Bollinger SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 May 1974
    ...a final Court "shall". The contrast in the language is as clear as in the section of the Englishstatute which this Court construed in Re Baker (1890) 44 Ch. Div. 262, and has the same effect: the lower Court is trusted with a discretion, the final Court is not. All attempts to blur the dist......
  • HP Bulmer Ltd v Bollinger SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 May 1974
    ...a final Court "shall". The contrast in the language is as clear as in the section of the Englishstatute which this Court construed in Re Baker (1890) 44 Ch. Div. 262, and has the same effect: the lower Court is trusted with a discretion, the final Court is not. All attempts to blur the dist......
  • Ukm v Ag
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 December 2018
    ...24 Ch D 317 (refd) Ampthill Peerage, The [1977] AC 547 (refd) Anna Johnson v Mark Calvert 19 Cal Rptr 2d 494 (1993) (refd) Baker, Re (1890) 44 Ch D 262 (refd) Bank Mellat v Her Majesty's Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700 (refd) BNS v BNT [2015] 3 SLR 973 (folld) C, Re [1993] 1 FLR 87 (refd) C, ......
  • R. v. Johnson (J.J.),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 26 September 2003
    ...where a Judge has a power given him by the word "may", it becomes his duty to exercise it. ( In re Baker , Nichols (sic) v. Baker (1890), 44 Ch. D. 262, at 270.)' " The duty, if it arises, is inferred from the purpose and scheme of the Act or from other contextual factors ." (emphasis added......
  • Get Started for Free