Re Bayley-Worthington and Cohen's Contract

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1909
Year1909
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Duffy v Ridley Properties Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 April 2008
    ...Bank Limited & Ors v Duffy [ 1981 ] I.L.R.M. 309. He cited with approval a passage from Bayley-Worthington and Cohen's Contract[ 1909] 1 Ch. 648 in the context of a default by a party to a contract as a result of which it was not completed but it is clear from the passage which I now cite t......
  • Mandarin Gardens Pte Ltd; Toh Teck Sun
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1988
  • Quah Poe Hoe and Another; See Bee Hoon
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1989
  • Alivestone Investment Pte Ltd v Splendore Investments Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 March 1996
    ...is the sole reason for the delay.What constitutes `default` in this context? Parker J in Re Bayley-Worthington and Cohen`s Contract [1909] 1 Ch 648 considered the meaning of `default` in the course of his judgment. He said at (p 656): ... Default must, I think, involve either not doing what......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT