Re Birks. Kenyon v Birks

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1899
Year1899
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Bocotra Construction Pte Ltd and Others v Attorney General
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 23 Mayo 1995
    ... ... Nevertheless, the following comments by Lindley MR, culled from Re Birks , are instructive: ... I do not know whether it is law or a canon of construction but it ... ...
  • Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 12 Abril 2002
    ... ... given the same meaning throughout it; Re Birks [1900] 1 Ch 417 (folld). Judging from the ... manner in which it is used in other clauses in the ... ...
  • Walsh v Alexander
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Rhodes v Rhodes
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 19 Enero 1860
    ...English Reports Citation: 54 E.R. 162 ROLLS COURT Rhodes and Rhodes See Ralph v. Carrick, 1877, 5 Ch. D. 991; In re Birks [1899], 1 Ch. 703; reversed on appeal [1900], 1 Ch. 417. [413] rhodes v. ehodes. July 4, 1859. [See Ralph v. Carrick, 1877, 5 Ch. D. 991 ; In re Birlcs [1899], 1 Ch. 703......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT