Re Blagdon Cemetery, Somerset
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Arches Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Takamore v Clarke COA CA
...Calma v Sesar, above n 178, at 452; Re JSB, above n 175, at [60]–[61]; Hartshorne v Gardner, above n 178, at [9]; Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] 3 WLR 603 at 183 R v Stewart, above n 179, at 778. 184 For example, Saleh v Reichert (1993) 104 DLR (4th) 384; Buchanan v Milton [1999] 2 FLR 844 (F......
-
Takamore v Clarke SC
...of Newark, 349 NJ Super 251, 793 A2d 731 (App Div 2002). 147 Hardcastle, above n 79, at 50 and Jackson, above n 73, at 91–96. See also Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] 3 WLR 603 (Arches Ct) at 148 As in Pierce v Proprietors of Swan Point Cemetery, above n 82, at 243. 149 Judicature Act 1908, s 1......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2015-07-29, [2015] UKUT 463 (IAC) (Abbasi and another (visits – bereavement – Article 8))
...which, in effect, operates a presumption against exhumation: see Re Christ Church, Alsager [1999] 1 ALL ER 117 and Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam. 299 regarding the exceptional nature of the grant of the faculty of exhumation. It is also noteworthy that the tendency in the English Consistor......
-
R (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice
...authority on that jurisdiction is the decision of the Arches Court of Canterbury (on appeal from Briden Ch) in In re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299. However, as section 25(i) makes clear, it is only where the purpose of the disinterment is to remove the remains from one Anglican consecrate......
Request a trial to view additional results