Re Blake. Re Petition of Right of Annie Murtha Minahan
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1932 |
Date | 1932 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
O'Hagan (Personal Representative of the Estate of Dolan, Deceased) v Grogan
...phrases - "State Authority" - Whether Chief State Solicitor State authority - T v L (Unrep, Morris J., 23/11/2001) approved - In Re Blake [1932] 1 Ch 54; In re Deans [1954] 1 WLR 332; Earnshaw v Hartley [1999] EWCA Civ 1141 (31/3/1999), [2000] Ch 155; Flack v President of the High Court (Un......
-
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and Others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and Others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...which put section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 centre stage (see FII (SC) 1, para 41, per Lord Walker, referring to In re Blake [1932) 1 Ch 54; In re Mason [1928] Ch 385 and In re Robinson [1911] 1 Ch 502). The reality is, however, that those assertions are dependent upon an extreme ......
-
Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
...the purposes of the defence of limitation, within section 2 of the [Limitation Act 1939] and to rely upon the reasoning in In Re Blake [1932] 1 Ch 54, they must do so by averring that the cause of action is analogous to the common law action for money had and received. And if they assert t......
-
Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria
...1 Ch 385, 394. And Maugham J referred to the obiter dicta very briefly, on the apparent assumption that they were correct in In re Blake [1932] Ch 54, 84 Soar v Ashwell was decided on the basis of the law of limitation as developed by the Courts of Equity. Thus Lord Esher said at p 393 that......
Request a trial to view additional results