Re Bluebrook Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 2010 |
Year | 2010 |
Date | 2010 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
AIRASIA X BERHADS. Suhendran vs Kwan Will SenBOC AVIATION LIMITED
...as benefits to the Scheme Creditors under the Scheme. Reliance is placed on the following passage by Mann J in Re Bluebrook Ltd [2010] 1 BCLC 338 („Re Bluebrook’) at 363, para … The schemes release the scheme claims but it is part of an arrangement under which those claims are substituted b......
-
Noble Group Ltd
...in a liquidation of the Company, that they did not need to be consulted on the Scheme: see Re Tea Corporation [1904] 1 Ch 12; Re Bluebrook Limited [2010] 1 BCLC 338; and My Travel Group plc [2005] 2 BCLC 80 The consequence is that, at least so far as the Scheme is concerned, the holders ......
-
Saltri III Ltd v MD Mezzanine SA SICAR and Others
...Plc [2010] EWCA 1248 where a restructuring took place under an intercreditor agreement which was very similar to the present. Again in Re Bluebrook Ltd [2010] BCLC 338059, a restructuring took place involving steps under an intercreditor deed. The Mezzanine Defendants say that the process o......
-
Bluecrest Mercantile Bv v Vietnam Shipbuilding Industry Group and Others
...an arrangement may properly be promoted between a company and only some of its creditors, here lenders under a particular facility: see Re Bluebrook Ltd. [2010] 1 BCLC 338, Mann J. 17 The procedure for promulgating a scheme of arrangements under Part 26 of the 2006 Act consists (in summary)......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Adaptive Capacity of Markets and Convergence in Law: UK High Yield Issuers, US Investors and Insolvency Law
...1253.77 Landes and Posner, ‘Adjudication as a Private Good’ n 33 above.78 Re Bluebrook Ltd [2009] EWHC 2114 (Ch); [2010] BCC 209; [2010] 1 BCLC 338.79 Johnston, n 33 above, 356.80 Indeed, the case of Re Bluebrook n 78 above, itself involved junior or ‘mezzanine’ bank debt ratherthan a bond.......