Re Boks and Company and Peters, Rushton and Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1919 |
| Date | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
27 cases
-
Grange Developments Ltd v Dublin County Council (No. 4)
...(ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION) ACT 1919 MIDDLEMISS & GOULD V HARTLEPOOL CORPORATION 1973 1 AER 172 BOKS & CO V PETERS, RUSHTON & CO LTD 1919 1 KB 491 ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S41 LOCAL GOVT (PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT) ACT 1963 S55 PESCA VALENTIA LTD V MIN FISHERIES & FORESTRY 1985 IR 193, 1986 IL......
-
Middlemiss & Gould v Hartlepool Corporation
...Act, 1950, and I would not circumscribe it as Lord Justice Scrutton did the corresponding statutory provision in Re Boks & Co. and Peters, Rushton & Co. Ltd. (1919 1 K.B. 491 at 497). When parties to a dispute submit to having it decided by an arbitrator, two consequences flow from ......
- Dr Low Shik Aun; Dr Ng Ah Kow and Another
-
Goldstein v Conley
...entirely different process from an application under the relevant provision of successive Arbitration Acts: see eg In Re Boks and Peters, Rushton & Co Ltd [1919] 1 KB 491. 57 In my judgment, the position is the same whether or not section 66 applies. If section 66 applies, section 66(4) mak......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Idowu lnasa v. Chief Oshodi 10 N.L.R. 4. . . . . • . . 207 In re Adesanya S.C. No.Sc/130/1964 (unreported). . . • . 180 In re Boks Co. (1919) 1 K.B. 491; (1919) 120 L.T• 516. . In re Claim by Helbert Wagg • & Co. Ltd., (1956) Ch. 323; (1956) 1 All E.R. 129. . . . . • • • • • . . . . . . . .......
-
COMMERCE ASSURANCE LTD. V. ALHAJI BURAIMOH ALLI
...authori-10 ties: China Steam Navigation Co. v. Van Luan (1905) 22 T.L.R. 26; In re Brooks & Co. v. Peters Rushton & Co. Arbitration (1919)1 K.B.491, at pp. 496-497; and Russell on Arbitration (18th Edition) 329. I wish to begin my consideration of the above submissions by noting that althou......