Re Boks and Company and Peters, Rushton and Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1919 |
Date | 1919 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Middlemiss & Gould v Hartlepool Corporation
...is beyond doubt, it should be given less effect than a judgment." 17 In this case the Judge was impressed by the case of In re Boks & Co. and Peters, Rushton & Co. Ltd. 1919 1 K. B. 491. But in that case the validity of the award was doubtful - very doubtful I would say because of the illeg......
-
Grange Developments Ltd v Dublin County Council (No. 4)
...(ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION) ACT 1919 MIDDLEMISS & GOULD V HARTLEPOOL CORPORATION 1973 1 AER 172 BOKS & CO V PETERS, RUSHTON & CO LTD 1919 1 KB 491 ARBITRATION ACT 1954 S41 LOCAL GOVT (PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT) ACT 1963 S55 PESCA VALENTIA LTD V MIN FISHERIES & FORESTRY 1985 IR 193, 1986 IL......
- Dr Low Shik Aun; Dr Ng Ah Kow and Another
-
Nomihold Securites Inc. v Mobile Telesystems Finance SA
...it should be given less effect than a judgment. In this case the judge was impressed by In Re Boks & Co and Peters, Rushton & Co LtdELR [1919] 1 KB 491. But in that case the validity of the award was doubtful—very doubtful I would say—because of the illegality of the whole transaction. Natu......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Idowu lnasa v. Chief Oshodi 10 N.L.R. 4. . . . . • . . 207 In re Adesanya S.C. No.Sc/130/1964 (unreported). . . • . 180 In re Boks Co. (1919) 1 K.B. 491; (1919) 120 L.T• 516. . In re Claim by Helbert Wagg • & Co. Ltd., (1956) Ch. 323; (1956) 1 All E.R. 129. . . . . • • • • • . . . . . . . .......
-
COMMERCE ASSURANCE LTD. V. ALHAJI BURAIMOH ALLI
...authori-10 ties: China Steam Navigation Co. v. Van Luan (1905) 22 T.L.R. 26; In re Brooks & Co. v. Peters Rushton & Co. Arbitration (1919)1 K.B.491, at pp. 496-497; and Russell on Arbitration (18th Edition) 329. I wish to begin my consideration of the above submissions by noting that althou......