Re Bramblevale Ltd (Note)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Year | 1971 |
| Date | 1971 |
[COURT OF APPEAL]
In re BRAMBLEVALE LTD.
NOTE
1969 July 18,
21
Lord Denning M.R. , Winn and Cross L.JJ.
[1970] Ch.
The following corrections should be made in the report of the judgment of Lord Denning M.R. in In re Bramblevale Ltd. [
p. 136F, |
line 33: |
for “November 28” substitute “November 19” |
line 34: |
for “December 5” substitute “November 26” |
|
p. 137C, |
line 13: |
for... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Heatons Transport (St. Helens) Ltd v TGWU (Interim Proceedings)
... ... It is important to note that there is no question here of contumacious or insulting behaviour or interference with the administration of justice. There has been simply a ... ...
- Uthayakumar Ponnusamy v Abdul Wahab Abdul Kassim
-
Comet Products U.K. Ltd v Hawkex Plastics Ltd
...v. Yiammi (1966) Volume 1, Weekly Law Reports, page 120, so decided; and furthermore we ourselves in this Court,in the case of In re Bramblevale Limited., (1969) Volume 5, Weekly Law Reports, page 699, said that it must he proved with the same degree of satisfaction as in a criminal charge.......
-
Airbus Operations Ltd Qbe Insurance Company (uk) Ltd v Adam Lee Roberts
... ... defendant is in contempt rests on the claimant and the facts constituting any contempt must be proved to the criminal standard: see Re Bramblevale Limited [1970] 1 Ch 128 ... The claimant must also prove, again to the criminal standard, that the defendant acted with the intention of interfering ... In our view the doctor's note made in the course of his examination is to be preferred to the defendant's recollection over a year later and we are therefore satisfied that the ... ...
