Re Brockbank. Ward v Bates
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1948 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
- Hongkong Bank Trustee (S'pore) Ltd and Others; Yusof bin Ahmad bin Talib and Others
- Yusof bin Ahmad and Others v Hongkong Bank (Singapore) Ltd and Others
-
Michael Warren Ingram and Others (Appellants v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue (Respondents
...the land to her or to whom she might direct. But he was not bound to comply with other directions which she might give: see Re Brockbank [1948] Ch. 206; Re George Whickelow Ltd. [1954] 1 WLR 5 at p.8. He could not have been compelled to grant the lease, though if he had refused to do so La......
-
Ingram and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...(Div Ct); [1898] 2 QB 534 (CA); [1900] AC 124 (HL) A-G v Worrall ELR[1895] 1 QB 99 Belaney v Belaney (1867) 2 Ch App 138 Brockbank, Re ELR[1948] Ch 206 Cochrane, Re [1905] 2 IR 626 (Div Ct); [1906] 2 IR 200 (CA) Commr of Stamp Duties of New South Wales v Perpetual Trustee Co LtdELR[1943] AC......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...& G. 440, 42 E.R. 330, 20 L.J.Ch. 588, 17 L.T.O.S. 101 (Ch.) .......................................................... 153 Re Brockbank, [1948] Ch. 206, [1948] 1 All E.R. 287, [1948] L.J.R. 952, 92 Sol. J. 141.......................................................................................
-
The Changing Face of Trusts: The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
...and 9.2.51 Retirement and appointment of new trustees by the court is dealt with in sections 39 and 41 of the TA.52 (1841) 4 Beav 115.53 [1948] Ch 206.January 1998] Trusts of Land Act 1996The Modern Law Review Limited 1998 such beneficiaries could not appoint new trustees to the existing tr......
-
The Pension Trust: Fit For Purpose?
...means that notwithstanding the presence of a variety of actors and service29 Adams vClifton (1826) 1 Russ 297; 38 ER 115.30 Re Brockbank [1948] Ch 206.31 Re Vestey’s Settlement [1950] 2 All ER 891. See further, D. Pollard, ‘Trustees and fiduciaries: thelimits on any “no fetter” rule: Part 2’......
-
An Introduction to the Law of Trusts
...wish of either party, while a trust is not terminated by the death or wish of the trustee, beneficiaries, or settlor. 14 Re Brockbank , [1948] Ch 206. 15 Saunders v Vautier (1841), 4 Beav 115, 49 ER 282, aff’d (1841), 1 Cr & Ph 240, 41 ER 482 (Ch). This right has been abolished by legislati......
Request a trial to view additional results