Re C (Abduction: Grave Risk of Psychological Harm)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1999
Date1999

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
46 cases
  • Re S (Child) (Abduction: Custody rights)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 July 2002
    ...Australia. The majority appeared to be content to accept the views of this court in Re C (Abduction: Grave risk of psychological harm) [1999] 1 FLR 1145 at 1154 (to which we have already referred) saying at paragraph 43 with reference to Ward L.J.'s judgment:— "Because what is to be establ......
  • ZD v KD
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 June 2008
    ...3 IR 178 2003/37/8911 L, RE (ABDUCTION: PENDING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS) 1999 1 FLR 433 C, RE (ABDUCTION: GRAVE RISK OF PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM) 1999 1 FLR 1145 K, RE (ABDUCTION: PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM) 1995 2 FLR 550 HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION 1980 ART 12(2) HAG......
  • C. v G
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 5 August 2020
    ...by the Court in spite of the reprehensible behaviour of the defendant.” 57 In Re C (Abduction: Grave Risk of Psychological Harm) [1999] 1 FLR 1145, the father sought the return of his children notwithstanding a recent conviction for child abuse which he was appealing. The Court of Appeal h......
  • E (Children) (FC)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 10 June 2011
    ... ... on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 ("the Hague Convention"). The Swiss Federal Court had ... article 13b of the Hague Convention, that there was a grave risk that returning the child to Israel would lead to cal or psychological harm or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...an unwelcome return to the jurisdiction of the court of habitual residence’: see Re C (Abduction: Grave Risk of Psychological Harm)[1999] 1 FLR 1145 at 1154A, per Ward LJ. 16.35 It is important to note that whether an intolerable situation exists also depends on the protective measures whic......
  • Children’s Law
    • South Africa
    • Juta Yearbook of South African Law No. , April 2023
    • 14 April 2023
    ...Sonderup (note 37) para 44, as quoted in LD (note 31) para 26.45 Sonderup (note 37) para 44, as quoted in LD (note 31) para 26.46 [1999] 1 FLR 1145 (CA).47 [1999] 1 FLR 1145 (CA) at 1154A–B as quoted in Pennello (note 35) para 34 and in LD (note 31) para 27.48 LD (note 31) para 29.49 KG v C......