Re C. (an Infant)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date10 June 1958
Date10 June 1958

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • A Local Authority v X
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 19 April 2018
    ...was described in the following terms: “ his personal family, that is to say, his wife and his children if living with him” [at 450]. In Re C (An Infant) [1959] Ch 363 at 367, it was held that the child was “ a member of his father's family in one sense, but not, I think, for the present pur......
  • Re M. (an Infant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 9 February 1961
    ...altogether – as it would in the case of an infant for whom his parent successfully claims diplomatic privilege, see Re C., 1958, 2 All England Reports, p. 656, or (b) at the expiration of the period indicated in sub-section (2) which is not relevant for present purposes, or when the Court ......
  • Shaw v Shaw
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 9 February 1979
    ...Servicio Nacional del Trigo [1957] 1 Q.B. 438; [1956] 3 W.L.R. 948; [1956] 3 All E.R. 715, C.A. C. (An Infant), In re [1959] Ch. 363; [1958] 3 W.L.R. 309; [1958] 2 All E.R. Dickinson v. Del Solar [1930] 1 K.B. 376. Ghosh v. D'Rozario [1963] 1 Q.B. 106; [1962] 3 W.L.R. 405; [1962] 2 All E.R.......