Re Callaghan (Deceased)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Ilott v Mitson (1st Respondent) Michael Peter Lane (personal representatives of Melita Jackson Deceased) (2nd Respondent) The Blue Cross Animal Welfare Charity (3rd Respondent) Royal Society for The Protection of Birds (4th Respondent) Royal Society for The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (5th Respondent)
...derived part of her estate from the bounty of her husband's employer was irrelevant. The judge correctly distinguished Re Callaghan [1985] Fam 1 where the stepchild had been very close to her stepfather and cared for him dutifully towards the end of his life to the detriment of her own circ......
-
The Estate of Neil Douglas Archibald deceased v Alistair James Stewart
...a description.” 42 There are only two reported decisions of the courts on the application of section 1 (1) (d). In In re Callaghan, decd [1985] Fam 1, Booth J held that the sub-section applied not only to minors who were treated as a child of the family, but also an adult so treated, in tha......
-
A (A Child)
...appeal and other similar cases: (i) Does the so called "millionaire's defence" (See Thyssen–Bournemisza v Thyssen – Bournemisza (No 2) [1985] Fam 1) still have a proper place in Schedule 1 proceedings? (ii) If so, by reference to what principled criteria is a Schedule 1 award to be calculat......
-
Harlow v National Westminster Bank Plc and Others
...the cost of his daily living at the standard appropriate to him. 70 The judge relied on the decision of Booth J in Re Callaghan, deceased [1985] Fam 1, where an adult stepson of the deceased, who had been treated as a child of the family, was awarded a lump sum of £15,000 to enable him and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Family Provision
...All E.R. 429 [1967] 1 WLR 1482. 69 [1994] 3 All E.R. 27. 70 Ibid. 71 Re: Leach ( dec’d ) [1985] 2 All ER 754, Re Callaghan ( dec’d ) [1984] 3 All E.R. 790. 72 Section 10 Family and Dependants Provision Act 22/1990. 73 Section 11 Family and Dependants Provision Act 22/1990. 74 Section 12(3)(......
-
LINES DRAWN IN BLOOD: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE ACCOMMODATION OF BLENDED FAMILIES IN SUCCESSION LAW.
...and Trustees' Powers Act 2014 (UK), Schedule 2, s 2(2). (166) Inheritance Act 1975, supra note 89, s 3(1). See e.g. Re Callaghan (1984), [1985] Fam 1, [1984] 3 WLR 1076 (Eng FamD); Re Leach (Deceased) (1985), [1986] Ch 226, [1985] 3 WLR 413 (Eng CA). See also Green, supra note 29 at 203ff; ......