Re Callaghan (Deceased)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
A (A Child)
...appeal and other similar cases: (i) Does the so called "millionaire's defence" (See Thyssen–Bournemisza v Thyssen – Bournemisza (No 2) [1985] Fam 1) still have a proper place in Schedule 1 proceedings? (ii) If so, by reference to what principled criteria is a Schedule 1 award to be calculat......
-
The Estate of Neil Douglas Archibald deceased v Alistair James Stewart
...a description.” 42 There are only two reported decisions of the courts on the application of section 1 (1) (d). In In re Callaghan, decd [1985] Fam 1, Booth J held that the sub-section applied not only to minors who were treated as a child of the family, but also an adult so treated, in tha......
-
(first) Brenda Gray And Others Against The Advocate General For Scotland
...14. The answer to this submission is, I think, to be found in the following passage from the judgment of Booth J. in In re Callaghan decd [1985] Fam.1,5: ‘Child’ , for the purposes of Section 1 , clearly includes an adult child. One of the persons who may apply by virtue of section 1 (1) (c......
-
Ilott v Mitson (1st Respondent) Michael Peter Lane (personal representatives of Melita Jackson Deceased) (2nd Respondent) The Blue Cross Animal Welfare Charity (3rd Respondent) Royal Society for The Protection of Birds (4th Respondent) Royal Society for The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (5th Respondent)
...derived part of her estate from the bounty of her husband's employer was irrelevant. The judge correctly distinguished Re Callaghan [1985] Fam 1 where the stepchild had been very close to her stepfather and cared for him dutifully towards the end of his life to the detriment of her own circ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Family Provision
...All E.R. 429 [1967] 1 WLR 1482. 69 [1994] 3 All E.R. 27. 70 Ibid. 71 Re: Leach ( dec’d ) [1985] 2 All ER 754, Re Callaghan ( dec’d ) [1984] 3 All E.R. 790. 72 Section 10 Family and Dependants Provision Act 22/1990. 73 Section 11 Family and Dependants Provision Act 22/1990. 74 Section 12(3)(......
-
LINES DRAWN IN BLOOD: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE ACCOMMODATION OF BLENDED FAMILIES IN SUCCESSION LAW.
...and Trustees' Powers Act 2014 (UK), Schedule 2, s 2(2). (166) Inheritance Act 1975, supra note 89, s 3(1). See e.g. Re Callaghan (1984), [1985] Fam 1, [1984] 3 WLR 1076 (Eng FamD); Re Leach (Deceased) (1985), [1986] Ch 226, [1985] 3 WLR 413 (Eng CA). See also Green, supra note 29 at 203ff; ......