Re Carrington. Ralphs v Swithenbank
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
...See the decision of the Privy Council in Rickards v. lothian (1913) Appeal Cases 263, at pages 281 and 282; and Wilkins v. Leighton (1932) Chancery 1C6, at page 114, where Mr. Justice Luxmoore said: "To make the occupier liable the plaintiff must prove that he hadknowledge of the existence......
-
Paragon Finance Plc v DB Thakerar & Company
...of trust as subject to the same limitation regime as the claim against the trustee: see J.W. Brunyate, Limitation of Actions in Equity (1932) Ch. 1. But the borrowers, who obtained the money by deceit and were the principal wrongdoers, were neither trustees nor fiduciaries. If guilty of fra......
-
Low Gim Har v Low Gim Siah
...All ER 484 (refd) Calgary and Edmonton Land Co Ltd (in liquidation), In re [1975] 1 WLR 355 (refd) Carrington, In re;Ralphs v Swithenbank [1932] 1 Ch 1 (refd) Caveat, In re A; Ex parte The Canowie Pastoral Company Limited [1931] SASR 502 (refd) Central Trust and Safe Deposit Company v Harve......
1 books & journal articles
-
The road (not) taken? How the indexicality of practice could make or break the ‘New Constructivism’
...practice as such’ (Turner, 2014: 123).This methodological principle has been famously and succinctly articulated by Alfred Schütz (1932: ch. 1) in his critique of Max Weber’s attempts to argue (transposed into a contemporary terminology) that there could be a form of direct or ‘objective’ i......