Re CB (Care Proceedings: Guidelines)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Re O and N (Children) (Non-Accidental Injury: Burden of Proof)
...for inflicting the injuries the child will remain wholly unprotected. As Wall J observed in re B (minors) (Care proceedings: practice) [1999] 1 WLR 238, 248, that would render the statutory provisions ineffective to deal with a commonplace aspect of child protection. The interpretation ado......
-
D v B and Others (Flawed Sexual Abuse Inquiry)
...information about the parties. I referred to the case of CB and JB (minors) (care proceedings: case conduct), Re [1998] 2 FCR 313, [1998] 2 FLR 211 in adopting this approach (i.e. the passage that reads: '(v) Evidence of propensity or a psychiatric or psychological assessment of one of the......
-
Re J (Children)
...for inflicting the injuries the child will remain wholly unprotected. As Wall J observed in Re B (minors) (Care proceedings: practice) [1999] 1 WLR 238, that would render the statutory provisions ineffective to deal with a commonplace aspect of child protection. The interpretation adopted b......
-
Re C (Care Proceedings: Disclosure of Local Authority's Decision-Making Process)
...attendance of court welfare officer), Re [1995] 1 FLR 622. CB and JB (minors) (care proceedings: case conduct), Re[1998] 2 FCR 313, [1998] 2 FLR 211. Clibbery v Allan[2001] 2 FCR 577, [2001] 2 FLR 819; affd[2002] EWCA Civ 45, [2002] 1 FCR 385, [2002] 1 All ER 865, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence
...is junky.’ That outlook waslargely promoted through the work of Huber, n 80 above. See also In re B (Minors) (CareProceedings: Practice) [1999] 1 WLR 238, 241, 250–255. In Australia, Chief Justice Gleesonreferred to ‘junk science’ during oral argument in HG vThe Queen S67/1998 (8 Sept 1998)......