Re Chapman. Hales v Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1922
Date1922
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Koh Lau Keow v AG
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 August 2013
    ...A trust for the advancement of religion was also presumed to be for the public benefit: at [41] , [44] and [45] . Chapman, Re [1922] 2 Ch 479 (folld) Chichester Diocesan Fund and Board of Finance (Inc) v Simpson [1944] AC 341 (folld) Commissioners for Special Purposes of the Income Tax, The......
  • Koh Lau Keow and others v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 August 2013
    ...beneficiary principle and is thus void (see e.g. In Re Davis, Thomas v Davis [1923] 1 Ch 225, In Re Chapman, Hales v Attorney-General [1922] 2 Ch 479, In Re Davidson, Minty v Bourne [1909] 1 Ch 567). The position has since been legislatively altered by s 64 of the Trustees Act (Cap 337, 199......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT