Re Clagett. Fordham v Clagett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1881 |
| Year | 1881 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Lowry v Derham and Others
...woman — Equitable execution — Receiver. Claydon v. FinchELR L. R. 15 Eq. 266. Cox v. BennettELR [1891] 1 Ch. 617 Fordham v. ClaggettELR 20 Ch. D. 637. Hood-Barrs v. CathcartELR 10 Times' Rep. 541; since reported [1894] 2 Q. B. 559. Hyde v. HydeELR 13 P. D. 166. In re LumleyELR 10 Times' Rep......
-
Rai Bahadur Singh and Another v Bank of India
...Chen Chien Wen Edwin v Judith Rosemary Pearson [1991] 1 SLR (R) 348; [1991] SLR 578 (distd) Clagett's Estate, In re; Fordham v Clagett (1882) 20 Ch D 637 (folld) Hau Khee Wee v Chua Kian Tong [1985-1986] SLR (R) 1075; [1986] SLR 484 (folld) K Sockalinga Mudaliar v S Eliathamby [1952] MLJ 77......
-
Au Wai Pang v AG
...Bahadur Singh [1993] 2 SLR (R) 1; [1993] 2 SLR 592 (refd) Brown v Brook (1902) 86 LT 373 (refd) Clagett's Estate, Re; Fordham v Clagett (1882) 20 Ch D 637 (refd) Cropper v Smith (1883) 24 Ch D 305 (refd) Dhillon v Secretary of State for the Home Department (1988) 86 Cr App R 14 (refd) Dorse......
-
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matter
...Dictionary appears to have stemmed from the seminal English Court of Appeal decision of In re Clagett’s Estate; Fordham v Clagett (1882) 20 Ch D 637, where Jessel MR held that a cause is said to be pending in a court when any proceeding can be taken in it. More specifically, no orders can b......
Get Started for Free
