Re Clay. Clay v Booth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1919
Date1919
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
87 cases
  • Ealing London Borough Council v Race Relations Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Actavis UK Ltd and Others v Eli Lilly & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 12 February 2016
    ... ... which a negative declaration would not be granted unless there was a claim of right ( Re Clay [1919] 1 Ch 66 ) has been abandoned. The modern law is that a negative declaration will be granted ... ...
  • Quintin v Phillips Petroleum Company
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 3 November 1997
    ...for the plaintiffs; A. Turner for the first defendant; J. Chapman for the second defendant. Cases cited: (1) Clay, In re, Clay v. Booth, [1919] 1 Ch. 66, distinguished. (2) Duncan, Fox & Co. v. North & S. Wales BankELR(1880), 6 App. Cas. 1. (3) Eastham v. Newcastle United Football Club Ltd.......
  • Midland Bank Plc v Laker Airways Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1985
    ... ... to take proceedings against either bank in the English courts, on the authority of In Re Clay (1919) 1 Ch. 66 , there is no jurisdiction in the court to make the declaration asked for. The ... ...
  • Get Started for Free