Re Clore's Settlement Trusts

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
99 cases
  • X and Another v A and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 November 2005
    ...regarding that as a benefit to her is founded on a line of cases of which the earliest (and closest to the present) is Re Clore's Settlement Trusts [1966] 1 WLR 35 In Clore the 21 year old beneficiary of a substantial trust fund had asked his trustees to apply for his benefit a sum (equal ......
  • Barclays Private Trust v C
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 24 January 2014
    ...Ltd., 2000 CILR 507, referred to. (2) Bridge Trust Co. Ltd. v. Att. Gen., 2001 CILR 132, referred to. (3) Clore Settlement, In re, [1966] 1 W.L.R. 955; [1966] 2 All E.R. 272, applied. (4) P Trust, In re, 2001 CILR N–18, referred to. (5) Public Trustee v. Cooper, [2001] W.T.L.R. 901, applied......
  • R FF v Director of Legal Aid Casework
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 23 January 2020 a person in any respect. 51 Mr Hickman referred to the consideration of the concept of “benefit” in the following cases: i) Re Clore's Settlement [1966] 1 WLR 955 (ChD), considering whether a distribution of trust funds to a charity chosen by the beneficiary was a “benefit” to the benef......
  • S (A child acting by the Official Solicitor) v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council and the Independant Reviewing Officer
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 31 December 2008
    ...which would leave the untutored layman puzzled (two striking examples in very different areas of the law can be found in In re Clore's Settlement Trusts, Sainer v Clore [1966] 1 WLR 955 and In re Y (Mental Patient: Bone Marrow Donation) [1997] Fam 110). But however far one can legitimatel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Benefiting Non-objects With Powers Of Appointment: Squaring The Circle?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 18 May 2021
    ...non-contentious practice, please click here. For more information on our Tax practice, please click here. Footnotes 1. After Re Clore [1966] 1 WLR 955. In relation to the possibility of delegation, see Pilkington v IRC [1964] AC 2. [2005] EWHC 2706 (Ch). See generally on this Lewin on Trust......
  • Jersey Royal Court Judgment: Does Charity Start With The Taxman?
    • Jersey
    • Mondaq Jersey
    • 21 June 2021
    ...the Court has accepted that for some families, charity can start with giving to the taxman! Footnotes 1 Re Clore's Settlement Trusts [1966] 1 WLR 955. 2 [2006] 1 WLR 3 Applying Re Hampden's Settlement Trusts [2001] WTLR 195 (a case decided in 1977). The content of this article is intended t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT