Re Coleman, deceased

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1975
Year1975
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Baker, Re deceased
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 Marzo 1985
  • Edna Cecilia Wilson (1) David Ellis Wilson (2) v Michael Edward Truelove (1) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 Febrero 2003
    ...on his strict legal rights, even such rights as arise under statute, when it would be inequitable for him to do so : see Crab v Arun DC [1976] Ch 1 79CA at I87G-188A; or (ii) that the instant case is one in which there is an estoppel by convention which precludes the Claimants from relying ......
  • Estate of McPartlan v Application by Dinneen
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 Septiembre 2020
    ...and again in Re Whale (deceased) [1977] 2 N.Z.L.R. 1. 39 The question came back to the English High Court in In re Coleman, decd. [1976] 1 Ch. 1. In that case the testator had made a will on 10th September, 1971, married on 18th November, 1971, and died a year later. The will, which had bee......
  • Juan v Juan et Al
    • Belize
    • Court of Appeal (Belize)
    • 22 Mayo 2012
    ...the relevant authorities, including those to which I have already referred, were fully and very helpfully reviewed by Megarry, J. in In re Coleman, Dec'd [1976] Ch 1. That was a case in which the testator, in his will dated 10 September 1971, made a specific devise in favour of a lady, who ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • Damages in Dissonance: The 'Shocking' Penalty for Illegal Music File-Sharing
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 39-3, May 2011
    • 1 Mayo 2011
    ...Act of July 8, 1870, 16 Stat. 198; Act of Feb. 3, 1831, 4 Stat. 436. 40 Copyright Act of 1909, ch. 320, 35 Stat. 1075. 41 Act of Oct. 19, 1976, ch. 1, 90 Stat. 2541 (codified as amended at 17 U.S.C. §§ 101– 1332 (2006)). 42 17 U.S.C. § 102(a). 2011] DAMAGES IN DISSONANCE 665 works, and arch......
  • Wills Cont'd
    • Jamaica
    • Non-Contentious Probate Practice in the English Speaking Caribbean
    • 21 Septiembre 2013
    ...Judgments delivered in the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago, Vol. XIV 1953-1954 p.1; Pilot v. Gainfort and Others [1931] P.103. 33 [1976] Ch. 1. [1975]1 All E.R. 675. 34 See s.18 Administration of Justice Act 1982, England. 35 It is to be noted that the provisions of s.20 and s.13 respe......
  • The Succession Act 2006--an update.
    • Australia
    • Elder Law Review No. 5, January 2008
    • 1 Enero 2008
    ...R 516, a reference to "wife" was sufficient but in In the Will of Foss [1973] 1 NSWLR 180, Re Pluto (1969) 6 DLR (3d) 541 and Re Coleman [1975] 2 WLR 213, a reference to "fiancee" was insufficient. Yet in Re Chase [1951] VLR 477, a similar reference was held to be in contemplation of It see......
  • The Neglected Dimension of Commercial Liberalism: Economic Cooperation and Transition to Peace
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Peace Research No. 43-3, May 2006
    • 1 Mayo 2006
    ...logs and nickel. It could not, however,extract these resources on its own, owing tolack of knowhow and capital constraints(Nishihara, 1976: ch. 1). The Philippinesand Indonesia faced the challenge ofbuilding a modern economy, developingbasic economic infrastructure, and f‌indingmarkets for ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
45 provisions
  • S.D. Const. art. III § 5 Legislative Reapportionment
    • United States
    • Constitution of the State of South Dakota 2022 Edition Article III. Legislative Department
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...rejected Nov. 8, 1960; amendment proposed by SL 1974, ch 1, rejected Nov. 5, 1974; amendment proposed by SL 1975, ch 2, as amended by SL 1976, ch 1, rejected Nov. 2, 1976; amendment proposed by SL 1982, ch 1, approved Nov. 2, 1982; amendment proposed by SL 2002, ch 1, § 2; rejected Nov. 5,...
  • S.D. Const. art. III § 25 [Effective 7/1/2021] Games of Chance Prohibited-Exceptions
    • United States
    • Constitution of the State of South Dakota 2022 Edition Article III. Legislative Department
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...ch 1, approved Nov. 3, 1970; amendment proposed by SL 1974, ch 1, rejected Nov. 5, 1974; repeal proposed by SL 1975, ch 2, as amended by SL 1976, ch 1, rejected Nov. 2, 1976; amendment proposed by SL 1982, ch 3, rejected Nov. 2, 1982; amendment proposed by SL 1986, ch 2, approved Nov. 4, 19......
  • S.D. Const. art. III § 25 [Effective Until 7/1/2021] Games of Chance Prohibited-Exceptions
    • United States
    • Constitution of the State of South Dakota 2022 Edition Article III. Legislative Department
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...ch 1, approved Nov. 3, 1970; amendment proposed by SL 1974, ch 1, rejected Nov. 5, 1974; repeal proposed by SL 1975, ch 2, as amended by SL 1976, ch 1, rejected Nov. 2, 1976; amendment proposed by SL 1982, ch 3, rejected Nov. 2, 1982; amendment proposed by SL 1986, ch 2, approved Nov. 4, 19......
  • S.D. Const. art. III § 1 Legislative Power-Initiative and Referendum
    • United States
    • Constitution of the State of South Dakota 2022 Edition Article III. Legislative Department
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...rejected Nov. 3, 1970; amendment proposed by SL 1974, ch 1, rejected Nov. 5, 1974; amendment proposed by SL 1975, ch 2, as amended by SL 1976, ch 1, rejected Nov. 2, 1976; amendments proposed by SL 1980, chs 2 and 3, rejected Nov. 4, 1980; amendment proposed by SL 1987, ch 1, approved Novem......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT