Re Coles and Ravenshear
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1907 |
| Year | 1907 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
86 cases
- Collector of Land Revenue, Penang and Another; Penang Development Corporation
- Lee Chooi Ying and Brijkishore and Another v Lee Chooi Ying; Sinnathamby and Another
- Khaw Yen-Yen and Another; Tan Chwee Geok and Another
- Ban Hin Lee Credit Sdn Bhd v Utama Computer Centre Sdn Bhd and Others
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Courts 2
...used in the rule as learned counsel for the respondents has contended? It is Lord Collins M.R. who said in Coles and Ravenshear in re . (1907) 1 K.B. 1 at page 4: - “Although I agree that a Court cannot conduct its business without a code of procedure, I think that the relation of rules of ......
-
THE IDEALS IN THE PROPOSED RULES OF COURT
...delivered at the District Judges' Annual Seminar on 22 March 2013. 17 [2000] 3 SLR(R) 745 at [16]. 18 Also see Re Coles and Ravenshear [1907] 1 KB 1 at 4, where a similar characterisation of procedure is found. 19 [2005] 2 SLR(R) 425. 20 United Overseas Bank Ltd v Ng Huat Foundations Pte Lt......
-
From norms to facts: the realization of rights in common and civil private law.
...of prescription apply, etc. For the English common law, see Birks, "Rights, Wrong", supra note 29 at 15. (54) Re Coles and Ravenshear, [1907] 1 KB 1 at 1, 4, [1907] 23 Times LR (55) Samuel, "Legal Remedies", supra note 4 at 40; Laycock, supra note 22. (56) See Part II.2(b), above. (57) Andr......
-
SIMPLIFYING LEGAL DECISIONS: FACTOR OVERLOAD IN CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.
...Statistics Quarterly', GOV.UK (Web Page, 1 September 2016) , archived at . (15) Tidmarsh (n 12) 882, citing Re Coles and Ravenshear [1907] 1 KB 1, 4. See also Tilomas O Main, 'The Procedural Foundation of Substantive Law' (2010) 87 Washington University Law Review 801, 810, citing Sir John ......