Re Coney
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Whig v Whig
...insolvency) but whether he was unable to pay those debts at the time they were due ('commercial' insolvency): Re Coney (A Bankrupt) [1998] BPIR 333. 53 The matter was put very clearly by the Deputy Judge, Mr David Oliver QC, at page 335: "Inability to pay one's debts, at least in the contex......
-
Julie Ann Mowbray v Michael Colin John Sanders (Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Julie Ann Mowbray) and Another
...there is clear other evidence of insolvency). Askew v Peter Dominic Ltd[supra] provides confirmation of this, and an example; so does Re Coney [1998] BPIR 333. 83 Thus, the fact that I have reached a different conclusion than did the Deputy District Judge on the principal issues as to wheth......
-
Mr Mohammad Razi Khan v Ms Arvinder Singh-Sall (the Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mr Mohammad Razi Khan)
...evidence of insolvency). Askew v Peter Dominic Ltd [above] provides confirmation of this, and an example; so does Re Coney (A Bankrupt) [1998] BPIR 333, ChD. [83] Thus, the fact that I have reached a different conclusion than did the deputy district judge on the principal issues as to wheth......
-
Mekarska v Ruiz and another
...for annulment had not been crossed and the wife’s application therefore had to be refused (see [82]–[83], below); Re Coney (a Bankrupt) [1998] BPIR 333 and Paulin v Paulin[2009] 2 FCR 477 (2) The wife’s claim that the district judge had failed to give first consideration to the child’s posi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Re Gudmundsson - Annulment And Divorce
...had been properly made. Re Holliday, Chief Judge Briggs said, was still good law, but for good measure he referred also to Re Coney [1998] BPIR 333 which makes the same point. The position, was, however, different if the statements supporting the petition were false, i.e. there were no debt......