Re Craig, deceased ; Meneces and Another v Middleton and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1970 |
| Date | 1970 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
60 cases
-
Re The Estate of Brocklehurst, deceased
...Zamet v. Hyman (1961) 1 Weekly Law Reports at page 1446, which were adopted and applied by Mr. Justice Ungoed-Thomas in Re Craig (1971) Chancery 95 at page 104. 23The Judge also thought that Mr. Robert's solicitor, Mr. Macmillan, ought to have acted differently. He applied to the solicitor......
-
Michele Alexia Canham v Cutty Sark Land Company
...spouses may arise from special circumstances of illness and dependency. In the words of Ungoed-Thomas J in Re Craig; Meneces v Middleton [1971] Ch 95 at p 104G: ‘Undue influence and those relationships of trust and confidence which raise the presumption are left, unlimited by definition, w......
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
...spouses may arise from special circumstances of illness and dependency. In the words of Ungoed-Thomas J in Re Craig; Meneces v Middleton [1971] Ch 95 at p 104G: ‘Undue influence and those relationships of trust and confidence which raise the presumption are left, unlimited by definition, w......
- Derrick v Trinidad Asphalt Holdings Ltd and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionability
...company 104 CIBC Mortgage Corporation v Rowatt (2002), 61 OR (3d) 737 (CA). 105 See Section B, above in this chapter. 106 Re Craig (1970), [1971] Ch 95, [1970] 2 All ER 390. 107 Williams v Bayley (1866), LR 1 HL 200 (threat against son); Stolze v Fuller , [1939] SCR 235 (threat against plai......
-
Undue influence, the elderly and equity release schemes.
...Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No2) [1998] 4 All E.R. 705 at 712c per Stuart-Smith L.J. (giving the judgment of the Court). (76) [1970] 2 All ER 390. (77) [2001] UKHL 44 at (78) [1999] Lloyd's Rep PN 496. (79) Ibid, at 513. (80) See Fox O'Mahony & Devenney, op cit. (81) Burns, op cit......
-
Undue Influence in the House of Lords: Principles and Proof
...one for the purposes of regulation in this area.5448 His Lordship, ibid C–D, cites Allcard v Skinner, n 15 above, and In re Craig [1971] Ch 95. But each ofthese cases is entirely consistent with a ‘fiduciary’ account of the regulation involved in the class 2cases; indeed each can be regarde......
-
Financial abuse of older people
...relation to the victim. Forexample, wills can be set aside if undueinfluence is shown (Lloyd Bank v. Bundy[1975] QB 326; Re Craig deceased [1971]Ch. 95) ■if the tort of deceit is established, theplaintiff may be entitled to additionaldamages for injury to his/her feelings(Brazier, 1988) ■for......