Re Crossmore Electrical and Civil Engineering Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date1989
Year1989
Date1989

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
64 cases
  • Re Freerider Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 11 November 2009
    ...of 1992), In re a, [1993] BCC 325; [1994] 2 BCLC 146, dictum of Lindsay J. applied. (9) Crossmore Elec. & Civil Engr. Ltd., In reUNK(1989), 5 BCC 37; [1989] BCLC 137, dictum of Hoffmann J. applied. (10) Ebrahimi v. Westbourne Galleries Ltd., [1973] A.C. 360; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 1289; [1972] 2 A......
  • SCK Group Bhd v Sunny Liew Siew Pang
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Koh Jui Hiong @ Koa Jui Heong v Ki Tak Sang @ Kee Tak Sang
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Anthony King v Kings Solutions Group Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 May 2022
    ... ... “guilty” is wide enough to include a party who is found by a civil court to have made a fraudulent misrepresentation or to have committed ... For present purposes it is sufficient to refer to Re Crossmore Electrical and Civil Engineering Ltd (1989) 5 BCC 37 in which Hoffmann ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries