Re Diplock. Wintle v Diplock

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1940
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Gleeson v Feehan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1993
    ... ... (2)(a) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S13(2)(b) DROHAN V DROHAN 1984 IR 311 DIPLOCK V WINTLE 1948 CH 465 SUCCESSION ACT 1965 S111 MINISTRY OF HEALTH V SIMPSON 1951 AC ... ...
  • Sempra Metals (formerly Metallgesellschaft Ltd) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 18 July 2007
    ...recover a mistakenly paid legacy seems not to have carried interest, although a proprietary restitutionary claim did so: see Re Diplock; Diplock v Wintle [1948] Ch 465, 506-507 (following, on the personal claim, Gittins v Steele (1818) 1 Swanst 199, a decision of Lord Eldon LC) and at 558 ......
  • Monte Ulia (Owners) v Banco and Others (Owners); Banco, The
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 December 1970
    ...'or' means 'and'; but 'or' never does mean 'and' unless there Ls a context which shows that it is used for 'and' by mistake." So also In re Diplock (1941 1 Ch. 253) at page 260, Sir Wilfred Greene, Master of the Rolls, said: "The word 'or' is prima facie,and in the absence of some restraini......
  • Congregational Union of New South Wales v Thistlethwayte
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT