Re Drexel Burnham Lambert U.K. Pension Plan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1995
Year1995
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Re Z Trust
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 2 June 1997
    ...537, considered. (5) Dicconson v. Talbot(1870), L.R. 6 Ch. App. 32; 24 L.T. 49. (6) Drexel Burnham Lambert UK Pension Plan, In re, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 32, observations of Lindsay J. applied. (7) Edwards” Will Trusts, Re, Dalgliesh v. Leighton, [1947] 2 All E.R. 521, considered. (8) French Prote......
  • John P Greene and Others v Danny Coady and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 4 February 2014
    ...& ORS SNELLS EQUITY 32ED 2010 PARA 7.018 MCGHEE & ORS SNELLS EQUITY 32ED 2010 PARA 7.038 DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT UK PENSION PLAN, IN RE 1995 1 WLR 32 1994 PENS LR 75 MCGHEE & ORS SNELLS EQUITY 32ED 2010 PARA 7.036 SARGEANT v NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC 1991 61 P & CR 518 MCGHEE & ORS SNELL......
  • Breen v Williams
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • The Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v HM Attorney General and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 9 June 2017
    ...construction. The court, he said, could direct Sir Christopher and Ms Cooper to vote, and pointed to cases such as In re Drexel Burnham Lambert UK Pension Plan [1995] 1 WLR 32 where the court had held that it could authorise conflicted directors to take appropriate steps notwithstanding the......
  • Get Started for Free