Re Emery. Emery v Emery

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1923
Year1923
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Barclays Private Bank & Trust Ltd v McLaughlin
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 25 November 1998
    ...[1907] 2 Ch. 406; (1907), 76 L.J.Ch. 584, applied. (5) Cotorro Trust, In re, 1997 CILR 1, applied. (6) Emery, In re, Emery v. EmeryELR[1923] P. 184; (1923), 92 L.J.P. 138, distinguished. (7) Evans, In reWLR, [1986] 1 W.L.R. 101; sub nom. Evans v. Evans, [1985] 3 All E.R. 289, dicta of Nours......
  • Bryan E Fencott & Associates Pty Ltd v Eretta Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Marshall v Wilkie
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 18 March 2002
    ...4 Mr. Connell for the caveator resisted the summons and relied on the decisions in the following cases: 5 In re Emery, Deceased [1923] Probate Division 184; and 6 Rose v. Epstein and Another [1974] 3 All E.R. 745 . 7 Under Rules of Supreme Court Order 74, rule 8 the defendant to a probat......
  • Vgi v Vgj
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 February 2020
    ...on the substantive effects of his acts, and not merely based on the fact that he had earlier lodged a caveat. The English cases of Re Emery[1923] P 184 and Rose v Epstein[1974] 1 WLR 1565 were not inconsistent with this position; they interpreted the effect of a caveat to be a notice to the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT