Re F.L.E. Holdings Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1967
Date1967
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Lin Securities Pte ((in Liquidation)) and Others v Royal Trust Bank (Asia) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 22 November 1994
    ...the latter's debts. There was thus no intention on its part to prefer RTB over the other creditors: at [32]. FLE Holdings Ltd, In re [1967] 1 WLR 1409 (folld) F P and C H Matthews Ltd (in liquidation),In re [1982] Ch 257 (distd) Ho Mun-Tuke Don v Oslo Finans AS [1990] 1 SLR (R) 326; [1990] ......
  • CCS 3542 1998
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 1 December 1999
    ...dominant intention was (e.g. Peat v. Gresham Trust Ltd [1934] AC 252, Re Cutts (a bankrupt) [1956] 1 WLR 728 and Re FLE Holdings [1967] 1 WLR 1409). Rental income 20. The absent parent (or the absent parent and his new partner jointly: see below) received £400 per month from the letting of ......
  • AC CCS 1050 2009
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 6 August 2009
    ...dominant intention was (e.g. Peat v. Gresham Trust Ltd [1934] AC 252, Re Cutts (a bankrupt) [1956] 1 WLR 728 and Re FLE Holdings [1967] 1 WLR 1409).” At the rehearing, the tribunal applied the “dominant purpose” test and found that the absent parent had not deprived himself of income. Howev......
  • Cooper and Another NNO v Merchant Trade Finance Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to take all the circumstances into account, and consider what is the correct inference to draw.' The dictum in In re F L E Holdings Ltd [1967] 1 WLR 1409 (Ch) at 1420 ([1967] 3 All ER 553 at 559D) 7. In order to determine whether the debtor had the requisite I intention it is necessary to e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Challenging pre-bankruptcy dispositions: An Australian-South African comparison
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...v Thomas (1834) 6 C&P 622; Ex parte Halliday: In re Liebert (1873) 8 Ch App 283; Smith v Pilgrim (1876) 2 ChD 127; Re FLE Holdings Ltd [1967] 1 WLR 1409. In the last case it was indicated that where the company mistakenly believed it had to pay because of the pressure, its intention was not......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT