Re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 02 April 1969 |
| Date | 02 April 1969 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Civil Aeronautics Administration v Singapore Airlines Ltd
...all pertinent facts and circumstances might not be before the court. 23 CAA has cited to us the case of In re Al-Fin Corporation’s Patent [1970] Ch 160 to argue that the courts have an independent role to determine whether an entity is a State. In that case, the issue related to determining......
-
R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Caglar
...to private rights regardless of any question of recognition or non-recognition of states. He cited: Re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent [1970] 1 Ch 160; Hesperides Hotels Ltd v Aegean Turkish Holidays Ltd [1978] QB 205; Spinney's (1948) Ltd v Royal Insurance Ltd [1980] 1 L1 LR 406; Reel v Holder......
-
Emin v Yeldag
...in the Hesperides Hotels Ltd case: 42. I have also been referred to the decision of Graham J in Re Al-Fin Corporation's PatentELR[1970] Ch 160, where he had to consider s 24 of the Patents Act 1949. The material parts of s 24 are: 43. In that case the question for the court was whether ther......
-
The Republic of Serbia v Imagesat International NV
...of Formosa. Again, courts have considered whether North Korea and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus are states: see respectively Al Fin's Patent [1971] Ch 160 and Calgar v Billingham [1996] STC (SCD) 150. Thirdly, in Grehard Dirks' Applications (1960) 1 RPC 1 the court considered issu......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Subjects of international law: a power-based analysis.
...West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), 1971 I.C.J. 16, 125 (June 21); In re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent, [1970] Ch. 160, 177-81 (Apr. 2, 1969); Hopkins v. United Mexican States, 4 U.N. Rep. Int'l Arb. Awards 41 (1926); PAUL GUGGENHEIM, REPERTOIRE SUISSE DE DROI......
-
The Orams Case, the Judgments Regulation and Public Policy: An English and European Law Perspective
...the divorce-decre e may never have been upheld. In th is respect, Emin v. Yeldag is not dis similar to In re Al Fin Corporation’s Patent [1970] 1 Ch 160, where the statutor y interpretation route oere d an escape route from t he need to reach a decision on the de licate issue of North Kore......