Re Finucane's Application for Judicial Review

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
Judgment Date2017
Neutral Citation[2017] NICA 7
Date2017
CourtCourt of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • An application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 2023
    ... ... In that context, the court has to bear in mind that to hold that the reasoning in McQuillan is wrong and that Finucane was wrongly decided might affect ongoing proceedings in respect of Mr Finucanes death, as Lord Burrows JSC and Dame Siobhan Keegan explain at para 339 below. It might also affect inquests which are currently outstanding in respect of other Troubles-related deaths, and applications for the holding of an inquest. 50 Less than two years ago, an enlarged constitution of this ... ...
  • Re Finucane's Application for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 February 2019
    ...[2019] UKSC 7 before Lady Hale, President Lord Kerr Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge Lady Black Supreme Court Hilary Term On appeal from: [2017] NICA 7 Appellant Barry Macdonald Fiona Doherty QC (Instructed by Madden & Finucane) Respondent Sir James Eadie QC Paul McLaughlin BL (Instructed by Crown ......
  • McGuigan’s (Francis) and McKenna’s (Mary) Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 20 September 2019
    ...been complied with; see [190] of the judgment of Gillen LJ and [10] of my judgment in Finucane v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2017] NICA 7. My comments at [11] of my judgment related to the historical wording of the declaration made. 47 [25] The first thing to say about this is ......
  • Finucane's (Geraldine) Application and in the matter of a decision of The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland
    • United Kingdom
    • 21 December 2022
    ...that the compatibility of prior investigations was an issue before it (see paras [93], [134] and [149]). In the Court of Appeal below ([2017] NICA 7), the judgment recorded the respondent’s counsel as submitting that, even if article 2 was applicable, the investigative obligations had been ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT