Re Foster

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1938
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Beswick (A.P.) v Beswick (A.P.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 June 1967
    ...then learned judges in various cases have considered the section. The history of these cases was summed up by Grossman J. in Re Foster 159 L.T. 279 at 282 in the following passage which Wynn-Parry J. quoted in arriving at the conclusion that the section did not produce the suggested innovat......
  • Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 November 1996
  • Foskett v McKeown
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 May 1997
    ...In the stated circumstances there is a right to reimbursement protected by a lien and that is all. The law is well settled. (See also re Foster No.1 [1938] 3 AER 357 and re Foster No.2 [1938] 3 AER 112Where the respective persons are already beneficial joint owners of the relevant property ......
  • Asaram v North American Life Insurance Company
    • Guyana
    • High Court (Guyana)
    • 28 July 1995
    ...merely a promissory representation or statement of an intention on the part of the insurers not binding in law or equity.” See also: Re Foster, Hudson v. Foster [1938] 3 All E.R. 357? (3) Whether there is any other method of performance open to the insurers under the relevant policy provisi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Enforceability of the Benefit of a Covenant
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • 30 August 2016
    ...i.e. s 56 will not in practice assist future purchasers of the adjoining plots; see Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58 at 106; Re Foster [1938] 3 All ER 357 at 365; White v Bijou Mansions Ltd [1937] Ch 610 at 624–625 ([1938] Ch 351, CA); Lyus v Prowsa Developments Ltd [1982] 1 WLR 1044 at 1049.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT