Re G (2003)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Re DE (A Child)
...entitled to seek an injunction under s 8 of the 1998 Act (see [33]–[36], below); Re G (care: challenge to local authority’s decision) [2003] 2 FLR 42, Re LA (Care: Chronic Neglect) [2010] 1 FLR 80, Re B (a child) (care order: proportionality: criterion for review)[2013] 2 FCR 525 and Re B-S......
-
X Council v B (emergency protection orders)
...me, to accord with the principles as I had set them out in Re G (Care: Challenge to Local Authority's Decision) [2003] EWHC 551 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 42. Very properly Mr Ryder did not demur, and when revised care plans for J and W were put before me at the next hearing on 20 October 2003 th......
-
S.S. (a minor suing by his guardian ad litem and next friend, M.L) v The Health Service Executive
...Service Executive [2006] IESC 60, [2006] 4 I.R. 374 and Re G. (Care): Challenge to Local Authority's Decision [2003] EWHC 551(Fam), [2003] 2 F.L.R. 42 andMcMichael v. United Kingdom (1995) 20 E.H.R.R. 205 considered. 7. That the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court could not be exercised......
-
Re A (A Child)(Deprivation of Liberty); C (Vulnerable Adult)(Deprivation of Liberty)
...Article 8 of the Convention (as to which see, for example, Re G (Care: Challenge to Local Authority's Decision) [2003] EWHC 551 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 42, and G v E and others [2010] EWHC 621 (Fam) at para [88]). Moreover, it is likely to be nothing but counter-productive when it comes to a ......
Request a trial to view additional results