Re G-Tech Construction Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2007 |
Year | 2007 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Peter Lloyd Bootes and Others v Ceart Risk Services Ltd
...judges at first instance are agreed that the Insolvency Rules 1986 ( SI 1986/1925) r.7.55 cannot be used to waive the defect. 7. In G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275 Hart J. took the view that the only course open was to make a fresh administration order with retrospective effect. In......
-
Euromaster Ltd
...in cases where the irregularity in question is not necessarily fatal to the appointment" I entirely agree with this view. 35 In Re G-tech Construction Ltd [2007] BIPR 1275 Hart J proceeded on the footing that the failure to file the correct form at court meant that "a necessary prerequisite......
-
Jacqueline Roma Gregory v A.R.G. (Mansfield) Ltd
...not apply to in terms of validating the actions taken (unless and until the Court otherwise ordered). 57 In Re G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275, in a judgment that was unapproved before the sad death of the Judge, Hart J, the wrong form had been filed with the court: the form after ......
-
The Registrar of Companies v Angela Swarbrick and Others
...effect — (a) at a time appointed by the order, or (b) where no time is appointed by the order, when the order is made"; and (ii) Re G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275, in which it was held that the court could specify a date in the past as the date upon which the appointment of an adm......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Administration
...were considered at 4.4.4 and 4.5.3. 163 IA 1986, Sch B1, para 33. 164 IA 1986, Sch B1, para 104. 165 See e.g. Re G-Tech Construction Ltd [2007] BPIR 1275 (retrospective order made under IA 1986, Sch B1, para 13(1) to retrospectively validate the appointment); followed in Re Derfshaw Ltd [20......