Re Garage Door Associates Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Chaudhary v Chaudhary
...1971 Act. This is the conflict of judicial decision which this court has now to resolve. In R. v. IAT, ex parte Home Secretary, (1984) 1 Weekly Law Reports 35, Mr. Justice Taylor expressed the view that he preferred the view of Mr. Justice Bush. 6 The section which falls to be construed is......
- Dato Lai Fook Kim and Another; Lai Kim Loi
- Sibu Slipway Sdn Bhd v Yii Chee Ming and Others and other appeals
-
Donald Quintin Cheung And Others V.fester Corporation Limited And Others
...plea itself might well produce a simple and expeditious answer. 18. Mr. Thomas relies principally upon re Garage Door Associates Ltd. (1984) 1 WLR 35, which was also the authority mainly relied upon by the first petitioner before Penlington J. Both parties petitioned in that case, each rais......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
...1 WLR 183. See also Re Bambi Restaurants Ltd[1965] 1 WLR 750; Re Leon Needham Ltd(1966) 110 Sol Jo 652; Re Garage Door Associates Ltd[1984] 1 WLR 35 at 38C—39F. 96 Supra, note 9, at 546B. These statements were followed by Chadwick J barely a month after Alipour was decided: Re a Company (No......