Re George. Francis v Bruce
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Gobind Lalwani v Basco Enterprises Pte Ltd
...v Ward (1845) 1 CB 858; 135 ER 781 (refd) Fidgett v Penny (1834) 1 Cr M & R 108; 149 ER 1014 (refd) George, In re;Francis v Bruce (1890) 44 Ch D 627 (folld) Ice-Mack Pte Ltd, Re [1989] 2 SLR (R) 283; [1989] SLR 876 (distd) Irving v Veitch (1837) 3 M & W 90; 150 ER 1069 (folld) Knowles v Mic......
-
O'Hanlon Paving Ltd. v. Serengetti Developments Ltd. et al., (2013) 567 A.R. 140 (QB)
...[para. 47]. Bank of Montreal v. Abrahams et al. (2003), 179 O.A.C. 36; 68 O.R.(3d) 34 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49]. Francis v. Bruce (1890), 44 Ch. D. 627, refd to. [para. Maltby v. Murrells (1860), 157 E.R. 1405, refd to. [para. 50, footnote 12]. Beaver Lumber Co. v. Hopfauf, [1932] 1 W.W.R......
-
Edmonton Savings & Credit Union Ltd. v. Grandin Park Barbershop & Beauty Parlor Ltd., Zottl and Chartrand, (1985) 62 A.R. 20 (QBM)
...the giving of a demand note as no demand is necessary, and the statute runs from the date of the note. In re George, Francis v. Bruce (1890), 44 Ch. D. 627; 59 L.J. Ch. 709; following Norton v. Ellam (1837), 2 M. & W. 461; 6 L.J. Ex. 121 (150 E.R. 839). "Under an ordinary contract of gu......
-
Tan Wei Qiang v Chan Tee Wah and another
...for making any request or demand: see Norton v Ellam (1837) 2 M & W 461 at 464; 150 ER 839 at 840 and In re George; Francis v Bruce (1890) 44 Ch D 627. 17 I cannot see how, when the audit confirmation letter clearly stated that the sum is due to the plaintiff, it can reasonably be argued th......
Request a trial to view additional results