Re H (Chambers Proceedings: McKenzie Friend)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Re O (Children) (Hearing in Private: Assistance)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 June 2005
    ...same way in this court today. 61 There is then a gap in time in the reported cases until Re H (Chambers Proceedings: McKenzie Friend) [1997] 2 FLR 423. This was an application by a father for permission to appeal against two orders made on different occasions in the county court. The first ......
  • R v Bow County Court, ex parte Pelling
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 1 March 1999
    ...and chambers hearings. 19In argument the applicant understandably placed considerable reliance upon the decision of this Court in Re H [1997] 2 FLR 423. The Court (Millett LJ and Ward LJ) appeared to suggest that a Recorder, in a County Court Children Act hearing in chambers, was plainly wr......
  • Re O (children) (representation: McKenzie friend); Re W-R (A Child) (representation: McKenzie friend); Re W (children) (representation: McKenzie friend)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...determination), Re[2001] EWCA Civ 1444, [2002] 1 FLR 39. H (minors) (chambers proceedings: McKenzie friend), Re[1997] 3 FCR 618, [1997] 2 FLR 423, M (contact: parental responsibility: McKenzie friend), Re[1999] 1 FCR 703, [1999] 1 FLR 75, CA. McKenzie v McKenzie [1970] 3 All ER 1034, [1971]......
  • R v Bow County Court, ex parte Pelling
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 July 1999
    ...friend". In expressing this view, we do not regard ourselves as saying anything which is in conflict with what Ward LJ said in Re H [1997] 2 FLR 423 at p.424A. 18 In the course of argument Dr Pelling also referred to Parts 1 and 39 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In determining whether a liti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Privacy's New Paradigm: The Rise and Reform of the In Camera Rule
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review No. 4-2005, January 2005
    • 1 January 2005
    ...County Court ex parte Pelling [1999] 2 F.L.R. 1126. 44 Editorial, “The McKenzie Friend Locked Out”, New Law Journal, March (1999). 45 [1997] 2 F.L.R. 423. 46 [1999] 2 F.L.R. 75. 47 F. Bates, “McKenzie and other friends in Australian Family Law” (March, 2003) International Family Law, pp.6–1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT