Re H. K. (an Infant)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1967 |
| Year | 1967 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
151 cases
- Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
-
McInnes v Onslow-Fane
...withdrawal of a licence and so on, and the distinction under the regulationsIn re H. K. (An Infant) [1967] 2 Q.B. 617, D.C. distinguished. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union [1971] 2 Q.B. 175; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 742; [1971] 1 All E.R. 11......
- Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan and Another
-
R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
...come in, but they have a right to be heard. The principle in that regard was well laid down by Lord Parker, the Lord Chief Justice, in Re H.K. (An Infant) (1967 2 Q.B. 617). At page 630 he said: even if an immigration officer is not in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity, he must at any r......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Corporation of Leicester (1892) 1 Q.B. 136. 650 Re Gellatty & Medicine Hat Land Co. Ltd. (1908) 2 Ch. 652, 659. 539 Re H.K. (In Infant) (1967) 2 Q.B. 617, 630. 623 Re Harrison (1891) 2 Ch. 340. 495 Re Hodge (1943) Ch. 300 and (1943) 2 All E.R. 304. 383 Re Morgan 35 Ch.D 496. 44 Re Pergamon ......
-
Reason‐Giving in Administrative Law: Where are We and Why have the Courts not Embraced the ‘General Common Law Duty to Give Reasons’?
...& Sons, 1952).169 See, for instance, Craig n 98 above, ch 1.170 Wade and Forsyth, n 98 above, 5 (emphasis added).171 Re HK (An Infant) [1967] 2 QB 617 (CA).172 In a piece of oft-cited dicta in Lloyd vMcMahon [1987] AC 625 (HL), 704 Lord Bridge famouslyopined that ‘so-called rules of natural......
-
The Reasonableness of Proportionality in the Australian Administrative Law Context
...The Theory and Practice of Wednesbury Review' [1996] Public Law 59, 62–3. 35 Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40; In Re HK (an Infant) [1967] 2 QB 617; R v Gaming Board, Ex parte Benaim and Khaida [1970] 2 QB 175. 36 See, eg, Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk (Regional) Police Commissioners [1979] 1 S......
-
HART V. MILITARY GOVERNOR, RIVERS STATE & ORS.
...v. Police Service Commission (1968) N.M.L.R. 102. 6. Board of Education v. Rice (1911) A.C. 179 (HL), 182. 45 7. Re H.K. (In Infant) (1967) 2 Q.B. 617, 630. 8. Re Pergamon Press Ltd. (1971) Ch. 388 (C.A.). 9. Reg V. Gaming Board for Great Britain, Ex-Parte Benaim & Khaida (1970) 2 Q.B. 417.......
Get Started for Free