Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1982
Year1982
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
44 cases
  • Progress Property Company Ltd v Moore and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • December 8, 2010
    ...passage ( [1964] 1 WLR 479, 495, set out at para 1 above) the words "however described" are important. 18 Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd [1982] 3 All ER 1016 was, on its facts, at the other extreme from Ridge Securities as regards the sophistication of the parties involved and the outlandishne......
  • Progress Property Company Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... In re Halt Garage ( 1964 ) Ltd [ 1982 ] 3 All ER 1016 and Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd [ 1989 ] BCLC ... ...
  • Clipperton and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • January 20, 2021
    ...in fact gratuitous (and so unlawful) dispositions of the company's money. At [18], he set out that in In Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd [1982] 3 All ER 1016 the company owned what was essentially a husband-and-wife business running a garage. When the company went into insolvent liquidation, the ......
  • Lucy Jane McCallum-Toppin v Alistair Bruce McCallum-Toppin
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • January 29, 2019
    ...there is no additional requirement to be satisfied that the payments also confer a real benefit on the company: see eg Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd [1982] 3 All ER 121 However, in the present case, I have already found that the remuneration paid to Alistair, Allan and Anna was not authorised ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Share Capital and Creditor Protection: Efficient Rules for a Modern Company Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 63-3, May 2000
    • May 1, 2000
    ...amount must be accredited to a ‘capital redemption reserve’ andsubsequently treated as capital (s 170).78 Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd [1982] 3 All ER 1016; Aveling Barford Ltd vPerion Ltd (1989) 5 BCC677; Barclays Bank plc vBritish & Commonwealth Holdings plc [1995] BCC 19.79 ibid ss 130(3) 1......
  • Ultra vires-leerstuk : hoofstuk 6
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2008-43, January 2008
    • January 1, 2008
    ...Sien ook Rajak 1995:9.91 Fourie 1996:48. Sien ook Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co v Riche 1875 LR 7 HL 653.92 Re Halt Garage Ltd 1982 3 All ER 1016; Re Horsley & Weight Ltd 1982 Ch 442 1982 3 All ER 1045; Rolled Steel Ltd v British Steel Cor-poration 1986 Ch 246 1983 3 All ER 52.93 Artik......
  • The rise, fall, and reform of the ultra vires doctrine
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • May 25, 2019
    ...ER 551; TCB Ltd v Gray [1986] 1 All ER 587; Barclays Bank Ltd & others v TOSG Trust Fund Ltd & others [1984] 1 All ER 1060 (HL). 37 [1982] 3 All ER 1016 at 1024. 38 See International Sales & Agencies Ltd v Marcus supra note 36. 39 Supra note 36. © Juta and Company (Pty) THE RISE, FALL, AND ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT