Re Hart. ex parte Green
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1912 |
| Year | 1912 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
- Johnstone v Guss
-
Re Al Sabah
...[1999] CLC 1, 469, referred to. (8) Hall v. WoolfUNK(1908), 7 C.L.R. 207; 15 Argus L.R. 60, referred to. (9) Hart, In re, ex p. Green, [1912] 3 K.B. 6; [191113] All E.R. Rep. Ext. 1164, followed. (10) Hughes v. Hannover Rckversicherungs-A.G., [1997] 1 BCLC 497; [1997] BCC 921, followed. (11......
-
Al Sabah and another v Grupo Torras SA and another
...this should be interpreted as "voidable" in accordance with the decision of the English Court of Appeal in In re Hart; Ex parte Green [1912] 3 KB 6. If the Cayman trusts are to be set aside under section 107, that can be achieved only by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, prima......
-
Re Dennis (a Bankrupt)
...person who elects to avoid a voidable transaction." (My emphasis) 114 Warrington LJ cited the decision in Re Hart, ex parte Green, [1912] 3 KB 6 and distinguished it on the ground that there the original disposal by the debtor was prior to the act of bankruptcy, though the later transfer by......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Challenging pre-bankruptcy dispositions: An Australian-South African comparison
...148 (1853) 13 CB 285; 138 ER 1208. 149 At 302 of 13 CB; 1215 of 138 ER. 150 Re Brall: Ex parte Norton [1893] 2 QB 381 at 384; In re Hart [1912] 3 KB 6 at 9 and 12; Williams v Lloyd (1933) 50 CLR 341 at 374; An Application by JGA Tucker and Reid Murray Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd supra note 5......