Re Harvest Lane Motor Bodies Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Deauville Communications
... ... (EX TEMPORE) COMPANIES (AMDT) (NO 2) ACT 1999 S1(3) HARVEST LANE MOTOR BODIES LTD, RE 1968 2 AER 1012 TELEGRAPH CONSTRUCTION ... ...
-
Whitbread (hotels) Limited V. Whitbread (gc) Limited For An Order In Terms Of Section 653 Of The Companies Act 1985 For The Name Of Walkmore (95) Limited To Be Restored To The Regi
...whose judgment the other members of the court agreed) from the judgment given by Megarry J in Re. Harvest Lane Motor Bodies Limited [1969] 1 CH 457 and set out by Millett LJ at 962D. Counsel for the petitioner further referred to the observations anent the intention of the section made by M......
-
Derbar Developments [Westport] Ltd v Companies Act 2014
...as extending to contingent or prospective creditors”. He referred to the decision of Megarry J in Re Harvest Lane Motor Bodies Limited [1969] 1 CH457, in which the court “declined to accept the more restrictive construction of the word ‘creditor’ in the corresponding English legislation co......
-
Lo Kwong Hung And Others v The Registrar Of Companies
...provision had come before the courts and the meaning of the word “creditor” received attention. In In re Harvest Lane Motor Bodies Ltd [1969] 1 Ch 457, the question arose as to whether a person who had a personal injury claim for damages against a company was its “creditor” for the purposes......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Restoration To The Register Of Companies And Winding Up Order
...that "creditor" should be construed as widely as possible to include contingent creditors (see Re Harvest Lane Motor Bodies Ltd [1968] 2 All E.R. 1012). The Court cited and relied on helpful authorities which supported the position that notwithstanding that a company was not carrying on bus......