Re Hayward, Decdkunicki and Another v Hayward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] EWHC 3199 (Ch) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Niki Christodoulides v CP Christou LLP
...(7) The Recorder failed to apply the correct legal principles and in particular failed to apply the principles as stated in Re Hayward [2017] 4 WLR 32 because he failed to analyse the legal consequences of his findings of fact; (8) In particular, in relation to the application of the relev......
-
Juliet Elizabeth Pattinson v Robert Ian Winsor
...or recklessly as to its truth; and (f) that the will is made only because of the fraudulent calumny.” That cites Kunicki v Hayward [2017] 4 WLR 32, at [122]. So those are the legal principles I am to apply. Discussion 16 The starting point here is that the April 2022 will is rational on it......
-
Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
...over the last 15 years. His experience as an expert witness and author was summarised by the English High Court in Kunicki v Hayward [2017] 4 WLR 32 as follows (at §78): ‘Prof. Jacoby is emeritus professor of old age psychiatry at the University of Oxford. He has been a psychiatrist since ......
-
Carol Frances Gowing v Terence Arthur Ward
...dispositions. If the will were so vitiated, it would thus be because the testator had not acted as a free agent. See Kunicki v Hayward [2017] 4 WLR 32 at 124 In closing submissions, Mr Myers submitted with some force and in my view some justification that it was far from clear which of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Testamentary Capacity and Intention
...what he tells the testator is objectively untrue, the will is not liable to be set aside on that ground alone. In Kunicki v Hayward [2016] EWHC 3199 (Ch), the judge found that the statements complained of were not false but, even if they had been, the elements of fraudulent calumny would no......