Re Hoicrest Ltd, Keene v Martin and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Ionut Cosmin Onea v Taiwo Ayoyunde Alegbe
...I propose to dismiss the petition.” 52 Finally, Briggs J referred to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re Hoicrest Ltd [2000] 1 BCLC 194, in which a claim for rectification of a company's register of members had been allowed to proceed, notwithstanding the summary nature of that jurisd......
-
Nilon Ltd and another v Royal Westminster Investments S.A. and Others
... ... VI Re Hoicrest Ltd ... 26 To a large extent this difference of view turned on the application of ... 98 shares in the company were issued to Mrs Martin (M). Mr Keene (K), who had been living with M, claimed that M had agreed to hold 49 of these shares ... ...
-
Pattni v Ali
...procedure similar to those discussed in Buckley on the Companies Acts paragraphs 359.16-18A and in Re Hoicrest Ltd., Keene v. Martin [2000] 1 BCLC 194) and/or (b) declarations that Mr Ali and Dinky submitted to the Kenyan proceedings, that they are estopped from making assertions as to the......
-
[1] Royal Westminster Investments S.A. [2] Bhagwan Mahtani [3] Sunder Dalamal [4] Nari Dalamal Appellants v [1] Nilon Ltd [2] Manmohan Varma Respondents
...'without sufficient cause'. The discretion is broad enough to permit inquiry into the substantive cause for the inclusion or omission. Re Hoicrest Ltd. [2000] 1 B.C.L.C. 194 applied. 2. In the instant case, the court would have jurisdiction to rectify the register where questions concern......
Request a trial to view additional results