JR 47’s Application

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
JudgeMcCloskey J
Judgment Date2013
Neutral Citation[2013] NIQB 7
Date25 January 2013
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
1
Neutral Citation No. [2013] NIQB 7 Ref:
McCL8735
Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down Delivered:
07/05/11
31/01/03
(subject to editorial corrections)*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND
______
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION (JUDICIAL REVIEW)
________
JR 47’s Application [2013] NIQB 7
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY JR 47 FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
PREFACE
Judgment herein was given originally on 7th May 2011- see [2011] NIQB
42. The outcome was an order dismissing the application for judicial
review. An appeal was ensued. This resulted in an incomplete hearing in
the Court of Appeal and remittal to this court. This was an exercise of
the power contained in section 38(1)(b) of the Judicature (NI) Act 1978.
In essence, the twofold impetus for the remittal was the Appellant’s
wish to rely on new arguments and new evidence. While the Order of
the Court of Appeal required the Appellant to provide amended
grounds of challenge by 18th June 2012, this did not materialise until 22nd
November 2012. Furthermore, while the case had proceeded solely
against the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety for
Northern Ireland initially, the remitted phase of these proceedings
entailed the joinder of an additional Respondent, the Belfast Health and
Social Care Trust. The further hearing eventually ended on 25th January
2013. The judgment of the Court has been augmented accordingly: see
paragraphs [46] – [87].
2
McCloskey J
I INTRODUCTION
[1] The subject matter of this application for judicial review is the resettlement
into the community of an adult person, whom I shall describe as Mr. “E”, from the
setting of Muckamore Hospital, County Antrim, where he has resided since 1997.
The Respondent is the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety “the
Department”. Mr. E’s challenge is, of course, fact specific. However, its resolution by
the court potentially has implications for the other members some two hundred in
total - of the cohort to which he belongs. In this respect, I am conscious of certain
other judicial review applications which are effectively (though not formally) stayed,
pending the promulgation of this judgment. Having made the aforementioned
observations, it is appropriate to add that the extent to which this judgment is
determinative of any of the other cases will be a matter for reflection and evaluation.
[2] Mr. E’s case, as formulated, traces the beginning of the “story” to 1978. The
landmarks belonging to the period under scrutiny, of approximately three decades,
can be readily identified in a chronological table helpfully prepared by the parties at
the request of the court, which I reproduce below.
Date
Document/Event
Description
1978
Service for Mentally
Handicapped in NI
Departmental Policy document
1997
Applicant readmitted to
Muckamore Abbey Hospital
Hospital Order under the Mental
Health Order
1997-2002
Regional Strategy for Health
and Wellbeing 1997-2002
2000
Applicant’s Hospital Order
ended, but continued in
hospital as voluntary patient
receiving therapeutic
interventions – offence related
2002
Bamford Report Commissioned
Equal Lives Report relating to
3
Date
Document/Event
Description
by DHSSPS completed in 2007
Learning Disability September
2005
2004
A Healthier Future: A Twenty
Year Vision for Health and
Wellbeing in Northern Ireland
2005-2025
2007
October 2007 – NI Executive
first Draft Programme for
Government
May 2008
Hansard Report on Health
Committee response to
Bamford Review
Debate
2008
DHSSPS Priorities for Action
2008-2009
June 2008
Response of NI Executive to the
Bamford Review Delivering
the Bamford Vision
NI Executive Consultation
Document
2009
DHSSPS Priorities for Action
2010-2011
2009
Belfast Health and Social Care
Trust
Mental Health and Learning
Disability Modernisation
Framework
February 2009
Resettlement Steering Group
Report
7 October 2009
Northern Ireland Audit Office
Report

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT