Re K (Abduction: Child's Objections)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1995
Year1995
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 March 1998
    ...Costello J., 12th November, 1992). Re HB (Abduction: Children's Objection) [1997] 1 F.L.R. 392. Re K. (Abduction: Child's Objections) [1995] 1 F.L.R. 977. K (C) v. K (C) [1994] 1 I.R. 250; [1993] I.L.R.M. 534. P. v. B. [1995] 1 I.L.R.M. 201. W. v. W. (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) [1993] 2......
  • Weeks v Williams
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 17 March 2003
    ...H (Child Abduction: Child of Sixteen), Re, [2000] 2 FLR 51; [2000] 3 F.C.R. 404, referred to. (2) K (Abduction: Child”s Objections), Re, [1995] 1 FLR 977; [1995] 3 F.C.R. 473, dicta of Wall J. applied. (3) M (Minors) (Child Abduction), Re, [1994] 1 FLR 390; [1994] 2 F.C.R. 750, dicta of But......
  • ZD v KD
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 June 2008
    ...S v S (CHILD ABDUCTION) (CHILD'S VIEWS) 1992 2 FLR 492 M (TM) v D (M) 2000 1 IR 149 1999/16/4930 K, RE ( ABDUCTION: CHILD'S OBJECTIONS) 1995 1 FLR 977 T, RE (ABDUCTION: CHILD'S OBJECTIONS TO RETURN) 2000 2 FLR 192 VIGREUX v MICHEL 2006 2 FLR 1180 N, RE (MINORS) (ABDUCTION) 1991 1 FLR 413 K......
  • C.M.W. v S.J.F.
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 July 2019
    ...that the test is a high one. Denham J. cited with approval from the judgment of Wall J. in Re. K. (Abduction: Child's Objections) [1995] 1 F.L.R. 977 wherein it is stated that grave risk ‘is not, of course, to be equated with consideration of the paramount welfare of the child.’ In that ca......
  • Get Started for Free